Comic ex-libris / Recent messages

and of the example I don't suddenly have 4 pieces with 1 item

Shit! I suddenly remember reporting that bug to Marco and that it has now been fixed. So it may have BEEN something has disappeared, yes, and I didn't feel good about that at all. You're right.

@Arwin: I love it when you're talking dirty to me.
Only a sick mind can think of such a thing. (;-)
However, that method does not work, because items related to a user can no longer be rejected. And after the merge, that user hangs on your 'temporary item'. Same player shoot again!

It is impossible for any administrator to delete something from your collection without you noticing.

This is certainly possible for a super administrator.
When the administrator creates a temporary item, merges the item from chevy with it, and then rejects his item, only the importer (the administrator) will be notified, and chevy will never hear from it again.

Of course it is not the intention for super administrators to work like this, but it is possible.

Goodbye Arco,

I'm not kidding when I say the items are really gone. They are also missing from my collection and I did not suddenly have 4 pieces with 1 item of the example, so it was not put together. I certainly never received any messages about the removal of the items, so I cannot tell you what will happen, but that something is not going well is certain.

I myself would choose the following method:

- Always include numbered and lettered copies. Reason: delineated whole.

- Record unnumbered only if none exist. Is otherwise the same item, so you can include it in your own notes: Unnumbered '.

- Only include signed ones if they are originally signed. Otherwise you will get ghost items with ex-libris that were signed once at a fair. In the latter case, the owner will add to his own notes that he has had him signed.

And you can rest assured: it is impossible for any administrator to delete something from your collection without you noticing. The worst that can happen is that two items have been merged, so you now have that item in your collection twice. Which is actually true. In that sense it is therefore reliable.

I agree wholeheartedly with you that a distinction must be made and therefore all four versions must be included separately, because there are price differences and are also collected separately ...

voortbordurend op eerdere topics over verwijderen en wijzigen van items nu de volgende vraag:

Wanneer een ex-libris meerdere variaties heeft:

EA

gesigneerd

ongesigneerd

genummerd

ongenummerd

beschouwen we dit als aparte items of als 1 en het zelfde item waarbij je in je eigen item moet registreren welke versie het is?

Enige tijd geleden zijn nl. om die reden en zonder mij te informeren items op deze wijze uit mijn verzameling en uit CW en daarmee uit mijn verzameling verdwenen. Ze staan nu weer op het punt verwijderd te worden: 2147939, 2147947, 2147955.

Ik kan me in de redenatie niet vinden omdat dit een regel is die alleen in de rubriek ex-librissen wordt toegepast en omdat er prijstechnisch een onderscheid bestaat tussen gesigneerde en ongesigneerde uitvoeringen bv. Daarnaast wordt het besluit eenzijdig door 1 of enkele beheerders genomen zonder dat het om vastgesteld beleid gaat.

Hoe betrouwbaar is CW nog wanneer dit constant gebeurt, hoeveel items zijn er uit mijn verzameling verdwenen zonder dat ik daarover enig bericht heb ontvangen?

De EA variant van item 1822147 is in ieder geval alweer in rook opgegaan...

Continuing on previous threads about deleting and changing items now the following question:

When an ex-libris has multiple variations:

EA

signed

unsigned

numbered

unnumbered

do we consider these as separate items or as 1 and the same item where you have to register which version it is in your own item?

Some time ago, for that reason and without informing me, items disappeared in this way from my collection and from CW and thus from my collection. They are now about to be deleted again: 2147939 , 2147947 , 2147955 .

I do not agree with the reasoning because this is a rule that is only applied in the ex-libris section and because there is a price-technical distinction between signed and unsigned versions, for example. In addition, the decision is taken unilaterally by 1 or a few administrators without it concerns established policy.

How reliable is CW if this happens all the time, how many items have disappeared from my collection without me receiving any notice?

In any case, the EA variant of item 1822147 has already gone up in smoke...

thx for responding quickly. yes that's him. thank you I know what value he has. thought I had a special item. but hell not.hihih

Greetings lioness33

Isn't this 38241 ?

have a classic comic here the evening views of suske en wiske on the island of amoras by willy van dersteen standard publisher. on the actor's side it says: on the island of amoras. this is a unique edition of the very first suske en wiske adventure that took place in 1945-46 appeared on the island of amoras aunt sidonia (then sidonie) and wiske met suske for the first time. in this first adventure lambik and jerom were not yet part of the party, but professor barabas, the genius inventor of the gyronef and the time machine. we wish you a lot of reading pleasure with this classic masterpiece by willy vandersteen. Now it says at the bottom right: this album may not be sold. have been looking here on this site, but don't see this album anywhere and what its value is ... help me find out?

with kind regards, lioness33

hello,

I have found 3 bundled strips from 1956-1957 of my father-in-law here in the closet

I am looking for someone who can tell me what this is worth?

it concerns the Tintin weekly magazine with a total of 44 bundled issues

In time, a splitting of personal (designed by name) and general (neutral) Ex Librises will also be needed. Eric de Noorman is (probably) an example of the latter category, but the various designs by Anton Pieck are also part of this.

Not anymore, picture was not completely placed.

Dit is een voorbeeld van een boeken exlibris, welliswaar met een stripfiguur 739347

Er zal (op termijn) ook nog een spiltsing nodig zijn van persoonlijke (op naam ontworpen) en algemene (neutrale) Ex Librissen. Die Eric de Noorman is (waarschijnlijk) een voorbeeld van de laatste categorie, maar ook de diverse ontwerpen van Anton Pieck horen daarbij.

This is an example of a book exlibris, albeit with a cartoon character 739347

In the long term, a split of personal (designed by name) and general (neutral) Ex Libris will also be necessary. That Eric de Noorman is (probably) an example of the latter category, but the various designs by Anton Pieck also belong to it.

Was it good for you too?

Yes, pegag, go on, go on! (;-)

Looks like he agrees with you.

I also hear, Pegag should continue like this.

Had I already merged, but I do not understand the comment of ivogebel ....

I still have it yet found a .

Hm, lucky that you are still paying attention.
Apparently someone else has already joined it because I don't see it.

@ pegag: Keep it up

@ pegag: Keep it up ...

I still found another .

Thanks, I missed it indeed.

I have merged them.

Is dit topic ook maar weer afgerond.

Bijna :-). Je hebt nog één doublure over het hoofd gezien.

Has this topic been completed yet?

Almost :-). You missed one more duplication .

@Arwin, keep going ....

Thanks.

I immediately transferred that invitation, because it is simply not a print or ex-libris.
That display without image is deprecated.
Is this topic also completed?

Oh well with a little art and flying work you can go a long way.

@Arwin, go on ....