Comic ex-libris / Recent messages

1813071 (Laiyna) zijn van oorsprong mijn scans, dus die kan\zal ik opnieuw aanleveren, maar 1823075 (G.raf Zerk) heb ik ook niet, dus dat wordt wel photoshoppen.

Laïyna heb ik net aangepast, daar zie je volgens mij niks meer van.

Voor wat betreft G.raf Zerk heb ik aan Jilles gevraagd of hij die even wil reviewen, en dan versie 2 wil afkeuren. (die is ook lastig te photoshoppen)
Dan klopt dat ook weer.

Overigens is als 3e afbeelding door de invoerder overal hetzelfde zakje gebruikt, wat mogelijk ook niet klopt, omdat de displays nogal verschillend van afmeting zijn.

Die zal ik later wel afkeuren, eerst even op Jilles wachten.

1813071 (Laiyna) are originally my scans, so I can\will provide them again, but I don't have 1823075 (G.raf Zerk) either, so that will be photoshopped.

I just adjusted Laïyna, I don't think you see anything of that anymore.

As for Graf Zerk, I asked Jilles if he would like to review it, and then reject version 2. (which is also difficult to photoshop)
Then that is also correct.

Incidentally, as the 3rd image, the importer used the same bag everywhere, which may also be incorrect, because the displays are quite different in size.

I'll disapprove that one later, wait for Jilles first.

1813071 (Laiyna) zijn van oorsprong mijn scans, dus die kan\zal ik opnieuw aanleveren, maar 1823075 (G.raf Zerk) heb ik ook niet, dus dat wordt wel photoshoppen.

Overigens is als 3e afbeelding door de invoerder overal hetzelfde zakje gebruikt, wat mogelijk ook niet klopt, omdat de displays nogal verschillend van afmeting zijn.

1813071 (Laiyna) are originally my scans, so I can\will provide them again, but I don't have 1823075 (G.raf Zerk) either, so that will be photoshopped.

Incidentally, the importer used the same bag everywhere as the 3rd image, which may also be incorrect, because the displays are quite different in size.

For example, the observant viewers will see pictures with double blue C's at various items in this series, because the images were not actually entered by the importer, but simply copied elsewhere from Catawiki. :-(

That is very bad, because the original import is apparently no longer on Catawiki This means that I should now actually reject items that were originally (presumably by others) in a correct way, just because someone has put them in "his own" section in this wrong way.

First consult whether the original images can still be found, but I have a hard time with this.

Edit, now that I have a closer look, it actually only returns 1813071 is a problem, and I can photoshop it.

Dit is een voorbeeld van een boeken exlibris, welliswaar met een stripfiguur 739347

This is an example of a book exlibris, albeit with a cartoon character 739347

In any case, I will be cleaning them up soon.

Please, because everything is wrong with this set. For example, the observant viewers will see pictures with double blue C's at various items in this series, because the images were not actually entered by the importer, but simply copied elsewhere from Catawiki. :-(

By the way, these are definitely not ex-libris, comic or otherwise, but just displays.

In any case, I will be cleaning them up soon.

Unfortunately, I have come across it before in another section that an administrator took control and set up the section according to their own vision without involving the other administrators.

It is true that managers of a section have a certain freedom to organize their section as they see fit.
After all, every collection area is different, and because a manager (if all goes well) is a specialist in his own field, it usually works out well.
But where it does not work out, action must indeed be taken.
As far as I am concerned, Catawiki is primarily for collectors, and the administrators should be employed by those collectors.

However, it is not always easy to determine what is best for a particular section.

Well, that's what I mean by a private column. Unfortunately, I have already encountered it in another section that an administrator took control and set up the section according to their own vision without involving the other administrators.

These are also definitely not ex -libris, comic or otherwise, but just displays. It therefore puzzles me why all of this had to be placed here. Although, everyone? Half is of course also just here , so that there are all kinds of duplications have emerged.

Ceterum censeo that all print-like sections should be merged as soon as possible.

@Arwin, a general print section is also possible. We should start working on clear criteria when something becomes an independent column and when not.

@ Arco, we opted for split-off for two reasons at the time. In the first place because it took up a particularly large part of visual art (now 11,455 comic book ex-libris versus 3,215 visual art). After that, the idea has existed for some time to divide the visual arts section (a somewhat vague term) into more recognizable parts. There were also quite a few collectors who did not expect comic book ex-libris under visual art and therefore placed it under Other.

What I do not understand is that a distinction between book and comic bookplates cannot be made within a general bookplate and print section.

Are comic pictures different from other prints?

In my opinion, the question is more why the ex-libris and prints of comics have been split from Visual arts.

It is intended that this section will be further divided into what it actually is, and the (theme) art section itself will disappear

I don't think that's the point, René.

In my opinion, the question is more why the ex-libris and prints of comics have split from Visual arts.

Ik heb Blueberry even een mail gestuurd over deze situatie. Als het geen strip ex-libris is dan moet het daar ook niet worden opgenomen uiteraard.

De reden dat strip ex-libris zijn afgesplitst van "gewone" boeken ex-libris, is dat verzamelaars van "gewone" ex-libris zich niet herkenden in de strip ex-libris omdat die weliswaar ook ex-libris worden genoemd door stripverzamelaars maar niet door verzamelaars zijn gemaakt om boeken uit hun verzameling te identiferen met hun naam er op. Dat laatste is weer een voorwaarde voor de verzamelaars van gewone ex-libris. Het begrip ex-libris wordt in de stripwereld dus anders gebruikt.

I just sent an email to Blueberry about this situation. If it is not a comic book ex-libris, then it should not be included there, of course.

The reason comic book ex-libris split off from "ordinary" book ex-libris , is that collectors of "regular" ex-libris did not recognize themselves in the comic ex-libris because, although they are also called ex-libris by comic book collectors, they are not are made by collectors to identify books from their collection with their name on them. The latter is again a condition for collectors of ordinary ex-libris. The term ex-libris is therefore used differently in the comic world.

In general, I don't get angry because it helps, just because I get angry.
I have already sent an email about this to René.

Maybe René will ask you who the disapprover was (I don't need to know that myself, although I can't imagine Jilles doing such a thing)

My expectations are not high, but some basic things just have to be in order.

We can transfer these days.
In the administrator forum I also created a topic where administrators can indicate when something needs to be transferred.

Rejecting things that have been in the wrong section for several months is simply not desirable.
It actually wasn't when we couldn't transfer.
The rejection in this case of something that was originally entered correctly is just plain bad.

And as for the scope of that section.

If the managers of that section are only interested in comics, they only become sub-managers in a general prints section.
High time to stop this kind of nonsense.
We don't have a comic stamp section, do we?

And best wishes to everyone, of course.

Where are my manners: Arwin, and everyone else "best wishes for 2012".

Getting angry doesn't help, you only have yourself with it. Maybe your expectations are too high? I always get that advice, not that it helps me, but maybe you? :-)

Fine, assume you don't need me, if you do, you know where to find me.

Cheers,

Chevy

Unfortunately I get few responses from the administrators to my emails or questions via the forum. I get some sense of a private section within CW.

That manager does indeed communicate very poorly, is also my experience. Have several items pending from him that I cannot handle due to no response. Might make sense if René calls or e-mails him about this?

It's just 2012, and I'm already swearing a lot again.

As far as I am concerned, the last word has not been said about this yet, but I will not talk about this further in the forum.

delete

Recently, even items of mine were thrown out without warning that I had entered before the word "comic" was added to the section.

Are we talking about move or delete ??

Totally agree Arwin, I was also amazed that this section has been transformed into a "comic" section. Recently, even items of mine were thrown out without warning that I had entered before the word "comic" was added to the section.

In this case, an item of mine, which is in a section that I manage, has been converted into ex-libris.

Unfortunately I get few responses from the administrators to my emails or questions via the forum. I get some sense of a private section within CW.

Edit: If you have reached an agreement with the importer, I would like to hear it and I would like to transfer it to Curiosa Other if desired.

Is this already progressing?
The importer indicates that it is an invitation, so I think transfer that bite.

On the other hand, the importer, modifier and presumably also merge of this item is the super admin of that section, so I'm not just going to transfer something like that.

Then I would like to know how both administrators actually look at their section themselves, and especially, why on earth this section is limited to the theme comics.

Now I am forced to add in other (no comic) to print , which of course makes no sense at all.
All prints should be placed together.

I had also looked at the history and found it indeed striking that this item has been maintained instead of the original. He has indeed been merged in the wrong direction. It is just an invitation card and the fact that it is screen printed and has the characteristics of an ex-libris does not make it a ex-libris. Well .... what can we still change? Do it again?

If you look at the history you will see that it has been entered as an ex-libris. Then earmarked by you as a duplicate (probably from an invitation card entered by you). After that, the item was changed back to its original title, and after that (but now I'm guessing) it was merged with the invitation card you entered.

In short: it has not been converted from an invitation card to an ex-libris, but merged with it (and if I have to believe you now: in the wrong direction).

Edit: If you have come to an agreement with the importer, please let me know and I would like to transfer it to Curiosa Other if desired.

Can anyone explain to me why the Super Heros card item 1759635 has been converted from invitation card to ex-libris. This is absolutely false. Please undo.

Thanks,