Comic ex-libris / Recent messages

ok very strange then because it says 1/8/68 on the back. how is that possible?

also looks exactly the same.

Moreover, when I look at the images of other providers I see that several people offer this album with isbn as the first edition.

if it is not a first edition then it is quite disappointing. yesterday during the comic days in Haarlem paid 20 euros for this comic.

If it does have an ISBN on it, the album is not from 1968, but somewhere from the 1970s.

But place the item in CataWiki with clear scan of the actor side with ISBN and we see further

Ik heb een vraag over de vierkleurenreeks van suske en wiske. Het gaat om nr 82 uit de reeks: de gramme huurling.

Dit is het catawiki nummer: 27166

Ik heb exact hetzelfde exemplaar als hier staat omschreven. Dus het

Laatste albumtitel: De gramme huurling.
Datum uitgave: 1/8/68.
Depotnummer: D/1968/0034/124.

Echter er staat ook bij bijzonderheden dat er geen ISBN op de achterkant hoort te staan. Echter op mijn exemplaar staat wel een ISBN namelijk: 9002106998

Weet iemand hoe dit precies zit?

I have a question about the four-color series of Suske and Wiske. It is number 82 in the series: the gramme mercenary.

This is the catalog number: 27166

I have the exact same one as described here. So it

Last album title: The gramme mercenary.
Issue date: 8/1/68.
Deposit number: D/1968/0034/124.

However, it also says in the details that there should be no ISBN on the back. However, my copy does have an ISBN: 9002106998

Does anyone know exactly what this is?

Thanks,

appears to be from 1978.

Regards,

Viper

Your Tintin may be one of the albums below:

http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/ comics / series-heroes / tintin / 404297-the-jewels-of-bianca-castafiore

http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/ comics / series-heroes / tintin / 226735-the-jewels-of-bianca-castafiore

The difference between these editions is mainly in the number of different languages mentioned in the colophon.

Hello,

I have a tint "The jewels of Bianca Castafiore" SC. The last number on the back cover is "Tintin and the Picaros. Furthermore, I have a year on the last page. D. 1967/0053/5 . On the back is the ISBN No. 90 303 2502 X . However, there is no Barcode on it. My question is before I enter it under which year this number falls? I have found a similar number from 1986, but my back is different, because I have no barcode. on it.

Thank you in advance

You have the version from 1989. The version of this album from 1989 that is already in the catalog has a different ISB number listed.

This is not correct because all other issues of lady X before and after 1989 have your ISB number.

I therefore removed the wrong back cover. Could you replace it with a photo or scan of your copy?

. Thanks I have now been able to classify the first as 1999. Numbers and barcode matched exactly. I am still sitting with the other Buck Danny against Lady X. The only one that comes close from the catalogs is from 1989. However, it differs on a few figures . It says on my back cover. NUGI 370 and ISBN 90-314-0065-3 and barcode: 9 789031 400652. I think that is later than 1989 ??? How do I find out? Last title on the back cover is: (head) BERGESE - CHALIER and then last is nr: 44 De Deserteur.

Regards,

Viper

The years do not say much about these editions. The fact that it contains ISB numbers means that they are from after 1975.

You can best identify them on the basis of the back cover. What is the last title? Is there a barcode on it?

The catalog contains a copy from 1980 and one from 1999 of attack on Malacca. Compare your album with that.

1130783

1903499

Hello everyone,

I have two Buck danny comics that I want to introduce. Concerns the numbers 17 "Buck Danny against Lady X and no 18 Attack on Malacca.

Now it contains ISBN numbers, namely 17 : 90-314-0065-3 and nr 18 : 90-314-0066-1. I now find it confusing which year belongs here now. On the front are the years D / 1966/0089/22 + the year of copyright 1958 ( No. 17 ). and D. 1966/0089/26 copyright 1958 ( 18 ). Now these comics look quite new and I think they are around the year 2000, 2001 but how am I supposed to find out? I have older songs by Buck Danny and I usually get that but not this one.

Mvg,

Viper

I see it and don't know how that happened

now it says the right number

Peter

that 859009 is not good ...

greetings

Morits

2179759 is dezelfde als 1827041

zo ook 2179769 en 1827049 

2179759 is the same as1827041

so are 2179769 and 1827049 

okay i will delete it

thanks for the information

It cannot be in the catalog because it is a non-existent item.

I dare not tell you the value.

Has that value, and what should I put it under

I've seen it, that at first glance seems more like a bundle of 5 individual albums made privately, not one / an existing release? What you have now put it under is not good (and actually the price is also not)

Thank you for your quick response,

no it is red old cover with the laughing wolf,

Can you take a look with my nectar shop, I am unable to attach a photo

Elise

Pegag means that you put your question in the wrong topic.

Do you mean this ?

And what has this to do with ex-libris or prints ???????

Hello

I have a hardcover Suske en Wiske with

5 first uncolored stories:

On the island of Amoras

the White Owl

Princess Zagemeel

the Black Madam

The Laughing Wolf

the strips are completely in good condition

can anyone give me its value?

Thank you

Elise

No, to my knowledge it has always been the case that it can only be the importer who hangs it. And in your trick, the user is no longer the importer.

I just tested it and you are right.
Then they would certainly have already removed it from their collection themselves after I announced that I would remove it.
In itself it is good that such a trick does not work.

Items attached to two users right?

No, as far as I know it has always been the case that it may only be the importer who hangs it. And in your trick, the user is no longer the importer.

However, this method does not work, because items associated with a user can no longer be disapproved.

Items attached to two users right? (or twice to a user)
Or have the rules about this been adjusted again recently, and can you now hardly disapprove anything at all as a normal administrator?

I have used this method on a regular basis in the past, to still reject incorrectly approved items.
And that was often just a collector, no problem.
Of course I have always reported the importer separately that I was going to reject his item and why.

(Nowadays I prefer to transfer those kinds of items to other first and check it from there.)

Only a sick mind can think of such a thing. (;-)

I actually thought it was a practical solution to a problem I was confronted with.